I'm with Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on this one - overcrowding in a prison is not cruel and unusual punishment, and we shouldn't release more than 40,000 prisoners just because they have long lines at the gym.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=1360186
In my opinion, overcrowding is not cruel and unusual punishment mainly because it's not prescribed as part of the punishment - it's a result of a great many number of people committing crimes and the state not having enough money to keep them all around in first-class quarters. I've never been to prison so I only know what I read and what I see in movies - and specifically movies that just happen to have a scene or two in a prison and aren't specifically about prisons - and what I think I know is that most prison cells house 4 inmates or less. Is that true? Let's double it. 8 inmates or less.
I've lived in Army barracks where rooms house 12 soldiers in a space just barely large enough to hold 6 bunk beds, one locker per soldier, and standing room between them. And I've lived in Army barracks that are open bays, housing 40 or more soldiers in a room similarly arranged. Sometimes that bay was actually a large tent. Where 80 soldiers share one bathroom with 4 stalls and 4 sinks.
So I don't feel particularly bad for prisoners who live in similar conditions. I work for a living, they hurt someone else AND are getting a free ride from the state.
Speaking of Antonin Scalia - I read his background on wikipedia and I agree with most of his opinions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonin_Scalia
Monday, June 6, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment